![]() |
| Falstaff and Robin |
An examination of Shakespeare and his comedy The Merry Wives of Windsor
Showing posts with label Peter Simple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Simple. Show all posts
Friday, June 3, 2011
Robin, Simple and Rugby
Friday, April 29, 2011
So...Who Are The Merry Wives of Windsor?
This took a little bit longer than I expected. Essentially there are 19 principal roles, with three of them going to children. Figuring out the relationships and what makes the characters tick is a time consuming process. Especially when there are 6 principals who do not have a lot of lines but a lot of stage time.
So let's dig right in and get to the cast breakdown.
So let's dig right in and get to the cast breakdown.
Labels:
Alice Ford,
Anne Page,
Bardolph,
Caius,
Evans,
Falstaff,
Fenton,
Ford,
Host of the Garter,
John Rugby,
Meg Page,
Mistress Quickly,
Nym,
Page,
Peter Simple,
Pistol,
Robin,
Shallow,
Slender,
William
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
How Do I Figure Out Who The Merry Wives of Windsor Are?
When I am picking a show to direct, I pretty much follow the questions as I have been asking them this week. I read a bunch of scripts and try to figure out why I like a specific script. I give it another read to find out what it's all about, discovering if it's a story I want to tell.
Then I tackle the big three: when, who and where. The answers to these three questions determine if it goes from a story I want to tell to a story I can tell.
While I normally start with "who", with Shakespeare "when" is the big factor. I try to find that hook that will help my audience get into the story and first see if the story can be set in modern times. I've set Two Gentlemen of Verona in a skate park, and Romeo and Juliet at a rave. I was all set to put Love's Labour's Lost in a fraternity house when I heard some Shakespeare purists in town were upset that I was always updating Shakespeare to the modern era. So I decided to show them, and I set it in the late 16th century and it was a mistake. The production had some glorious tech elements and some of the finest performances from my actors, but the audience had a visual hurdle they couldn't overcome in a single viewing.
"Where" is so closely tied to "when" and ideas do formulate right away within the second read, but first I have to determine if I have the personnel to do the show. And in order to do that, I have to know the job descriptions for each role. This does not mean that I cast the show this far in advance. I always wait until the auditions for that. Instead, I start doing what I call a breakdown of the script, so that I can get to know the characters better.
Then I tackle the big three: when, who and where. The answers to these three questions determine if it goes from a story I want to tell to a story I can tell.
While I normally start with "who", with Shakespeare "when" is the big factor. I try to find that hook that will help my audience get into the story and first see if the story can be set in modern times. I've set Two Gentlemen of Verona in a skate park, and Romeo and Juliet at a rave. I was all set to put Love's Labour's Lost in a fraternity house when I heard some Shakespeare purists in town were upset that I was always updating Shakespeare to the modern era. So I decided to show them, and I set it in the late 16th century and it was a mistake. The production had some glorious tech elements and some of the finest performances from my actors, but the audience had a visual hurdle they couldn't overcome in a single viewing.
"Where" is so closely tied to "when" and ideas do formulate right away within the second read, but first I have to determine if I have the personnel to do the show. And in order to do that, I have to know the job descriptions for each role. This does not mean that I cast the show this far in advance. I always wait until the auditions for that. Instead, I start doing what I call a breakdown of the script, so that I can get to know the characters better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

